← Back to all articles Productivity

Four-Day Work Week Statistics (2026)

A bar chart of four-day work week pilot outcomes

Fifty-six of the 61 companies in the UK's 2022 four-day week pilot kept the schedule when the trial ended, and 54 were still on it a year later. In the US and Ireland trial that ran at the same time, none of the 27 companies that completed the final survey said they would go back. Across the pooled trials, 2,896 employees at 141 organizations reported lower burnout and better health that 12 control companies did not. Those are the strongest numbers in favor. The honest ones alongside them: the pilots measured revenue and self-ratings rather than output per hour, the firms were small and self-selected, and the turnover and sick-day improvements were not statistically significant.

The pages that rank for this question report the 92% continuation rate as a productivity gain, present Microsoft Japan's one-month sales figure as a trial result, and label a five-year-old Icelandic 35-hour experiment a four-day week. This page uses the UK, US-Ireland, 2024-25 UK, German, Scottish and South Cambridgeshire reports, the Nature Human Behavior paper and the BLS hours data, states the sample behind every figure, and covers what the US baseline looks like.

The US baseline

Americans in private payroll jobs averaged 34.4 paid hours a week in September 2026, according to the BLS Employment Situation, a figure that includes part-timers. People who usually work full time averaged 41.9 hours actually at work in 2025, per the Current Population Survey. There is no federal count of employers on a four-day week, and the US surveys that estimate adoption, from the American Psychological Association and Gallup, could not be verified for this page. Gallup's measure also counts compressed four-day, 40-hour schedules, which is not what the pilots tested. Our working hours statistics page covers the baseline in detail.

The pilots and what they found

The trials share a design: a 20% cut in hours with no cut in pay, run for six months by 4 Day Week Global or its UK affiliate, with researchers at Boston College, Cambridge and Autonomy collecting company and employee data.

TrialCompanies and staffPeriodContinued after trialReport
UK national pilot61 companies, about 2,900 employeesJune to December 202256 of 61 (92%); 54 of 61 (89%) a year later, 31 permanentAutonomy, February 2023; follow-up, February 2024
US and Ireland33 companies, 903 employeesFebruary to October 2022Of 27 responding: 18 definitely, 7 planning, 1 leaning, 1 unsure, 0 againstBoston College for 4 Day Week Global
UK autumn 2024 pilot17 organizations, 950+ employeesNovember 2024 to April 2025All 174 Day Week Foundation and Boston College, July 2025
Germany45 organizationsFrom 202470% on some reduced-hours model at two years; 22% adapted; 30% stoppedUniversity of Münster, February 2026
Scottish public sector2 bodies, 259 staff, 32-hour weekFrom October 2023Continued; all process indicators stableAutonomy Institute, 2025
South Cambridgeshire District CouncilUK local authorityFrom January 2023Permanent from July 2025; 21 of 24 indicators maintained or improvedCambridge and Salford universities, September 2026

The peer-reviewed synthesis is Fan, Schor, Kelly and Gu's 2025 paper in Nature Human Behavior, pooling 2,896 employees at 141 organizations in six countries against 12 control companies. Burnout, job satisfaction and mental and physical health improved in the trial firms and not in the controls, larger individual hour reductions produced larger gains, and the effects ran through better self-rated work ability, fewer sleep problems and less fatigue.

Revenue and productivity: what was measured

No pilot measured output per hour. What they collected was company revenue and self-ratings. In the UK, revenue at 23 reporting companies rose 1.4% during the trial, and at 24 companies it was 35% higher than the same six months in prior years, a comparison that mostly reflects growing firms choosing to join. Companies rated the trial's effect on performance 7.5 out of 10 and on productivity 7.5. In the US and Ireland, revenue at 16 companies rose 8.1% during the trial and 37.6% against the prior year at 20 companies, headcount grew 12.2%, and companies rated the productivity effect 7.7. In the 2024-25 UK cohort, three of four organizations reporting revenue saw it rise. South Cambridgeshire's council maintained or improved 21 of 24 service indicators, with ten significantly improved and three declining.

The defensible reading is that the trials found no evidence of harm to output and some evidence of maintained or improved revenue, in small, self-selected firms, over six months. They did not find a 35% productivity gain, and the firms that would have struggled mostly did not apply. Our remote work productivity statistics page covers the measurement problem in a related context.

Burnout and wellbeing

Wellbeing is where the trials have their strongest and most consistent results, because employees were surveyed before and after with validated scales.

Our employee burnout statistics page puts the baseline burnout rates against these changes.

Retention, hiring and sick days

The retention figures that circulate are real and not statistically significant, and the reports say so. In the UK pilot, resignations fell from 2.0 to 0.8 per 100 employees, new hires from 3.4 to 2.4, and sick and personal days from 2.0 to 0.7 per employee per month. The authors state that all three trends fail significance because of small numbers and a changing labor market. In the US and Ireland trial, resignations moved from 1.76 to 1.70 per 100 and sick days from 0.56 to 0.39, again not significant. A year on, 50% of UK pilot managers reported reduced turnover and 32% improved recruitment.

The one case with large enough numbers is South Cambridgeshire, where turnover fell 39% after the trial began and was 41% below the pre-trial level by October 2025, applications rose 53%, 76% of new hires said the four-day week influenced their decision to apply, and the council estimated £339,263 in annual savings, largely from filling ten of 22 hard-to-fill posts permanently. Our employee turnover statistics page covers how to read small-sample turnover changes.

What employees would trade for it

At the end of the UK pilot, 90% of employees definitely wanted to continue and five people out of more than 1,100 said they somewhat did not; none said definitely not. Asked what pay rise would make them return to five days, 70% said 10% to 50%, 8% said more than 50% and 15% said no amount of money. In the US and Ireland trial, 96.9% of the 495 employees in the panel definitely wanted to continue, and among those who preferred four days, 42% would need a 26% to 50% raise to take a five-day job and 13% said no amount would do. Those are pilot participants, who are not a random sample of workers. US worker-preference surveys exist but could not be verified for this page.

Where it does not work

The evidence base is small firms: 88% of the 2024-25 UK organizations had 100 or fewer staff, and more than half of the US-Ireland companies had 25 or fewer. In Germany, 30% of organizations had abandoned reduced hours within two years and about 40% had limited the pilot to selected teams. In the UK pilot, 15% of employees worked more hours, 13% saw no change, and 49% saw no change in overtime. In the US-Ireland trial, 17% reported higher stress and 20% higher burnout. In Scotland, 20% of staff at two of five public bodies struggled to keep to a 35-hour week because of workload. Iceland's 2021-22 national survey found 55% satisfaction with reduced hours in the private sector against 65% to 68% in government, and 54% in male-dominated workplaces against 70% in female-dominated ones. The pattern across all of it is that reduced hours work where the work can be compressed and fail where it cannot, and that the trials have mostly enrolled the first kind of organization.

The policy picture

The Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act, introduced in the Senate as S.3947 in March 2024 and in the House as H.R.1332 in March 2023, would phase the Fair Labor Standards Act overtime threshold from 40 to 32 hours over three years and bar employers from cutting pay to compensate. Both were referred to committee and died with the 118th Congress. Elsewhere, 264 UK employers are accredited by the 4 Day Week Foundation as permanently on a four-day week, 72 of 73 Scottish public bodies moved to a 35-hour contractual week by April 2025, and about 86% of Iceland's workforce gained shorter hours or the right to them through agreements negotiated between 2019 and 2021, following trials that cut hours from 40 to 35 or 36. Our overtime calculator covers the current 40-hour threshold.

Figures to stop using

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

How many companies have a four-day work week?

No US statistic exists. In the UK, 264 employers are accredited as permanently on a four-day week and 232 organizations with about 6,000 employees were on one with no loss of pay as of June 2025. Average US private payroll hours are 34.4 a week, which includes part-timers.

Does a four-day work week increase productivity?

The pilots did not measure output per hour. UK companies rated the effect on productivity 7.5 out of 10 and US-Ireland companies 7.7, and revenue rose 1.4% and 8.1% respectively during the six-month trials. The defensible finding is no evidence of harm in small, self-selected firms.

Does a four-day week reduce burnout?

Yes, in every trial that measured it. 71% of UK pilot employees reported lower burnout in 2022, 67% in the US-Ireland trial, and 62% in the 2024-25 UK cohort. The pooled analysis of 2,896 employees in Nature Human Behavior found improvements that 12 control companies did not show.

How many companies keep the four-day week after a trial?

Most. 92% of UK pilot companies continued immediately and 89% were still on it a year later, with 51% permanent. All 17 of the 2024-25 UK cohort continued. In Germany, 70% of trial organizations kept some reduced-hours model after two years and 30% did not.

Would workers take a pay cut for a four-day week?

Pilot participants value it the other way. 70% of UK pilot employees said they would need a 10% to 50% raise to return to five days and 15% said no amount would do. In the US-Ireland trial, 13% said no amount of money and 42% wanted a 26% to 50% raise.

Does a four-day week improve retention?

The trial data point that way but are not statistically significant. UK resignations fell from 2.0 to 0.8 per 100 employees. The one large case, South Cambridgeshire council, saw turnover fall 41% and applications rise 53% after adopting a four-day week in 2023.

Is there a 32-hour work week law in the US?

No. The Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act, introduced in the House in March 2023 and the Senate in March 2024, would have phased the overtime threshold from 40 to 32 hours over three years. Both bills were referred to committee and did not advance.

Did Iceland move to a four-day week?

No. Iceland's 2015 to 2019 trials of more than 2,500 public workers cut hours from 40 to 35 or 36 a week, after which about 86% of the workforce gained shorter hours or the right to them. A 2021-22 survey found 59% had actually been offered shorter hours.

← Back to all articles